🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager could survive defeat by Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over System and Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really creating the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively that system. Hire the process guy and then bin him for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.